Arts
Uganda’s election to World Heritage body a test for Mengo
![](https://sunrise.ug/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Kasubi-tombs.jpg)
The fate of Kasubi tombs, one of only 3 of Uganda’s World Heritage Sites remains in critical balance
Uganda first ever appearance on the committee came after it beat competition out eleven other countries to the influential body including countries like Australia, Brazil and China.
This was during the 21st General Assembly of the State Parties to the World Heritage Convention held at the UNESCO Headquarters in Paris on November 14, 2017. Twelve new member countries were chosen to the World Heritage Committee.
It is the first time Uganda will be serving as a member of the World Heritage Committee after the assembly of the 193 States Parties to the World Heritage Convention cast their votes in a hotly contested election.
The World Heritage Committee is responsible for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention, defines the use of the World Heritage Fund and allocates financial assistance upon requests from States Parties. It has the final say on whether a property is inscribed on the World Heritage List.
The committee examines reports on the state of conservation of inscribed properties and asks States Parties to take action when properties are not being properly managed. It also decides on the inscription or deletion of properties on the List of World Heritage in danger.
There are three UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Uganda; Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park, Rwenzori Mountains National Park and Kasubi Tombs (Amasiro). The Tombs are presently undergoing reconstruction following a 2013 fire.
Uganda’s election to the committee will likely bring a spotlight to the snail pace with which Buganda Kingdom has handled the reconstruction of the Tombs. This is despite a massive fundraising campaign by the Kingdom under the stewardship its Premier (Katikkiro) Charles Peter Mayiga.
The election of the members of the World Heritage Committee are conducted on the basis of the composition of the electoral groups of UNESCO, as determined by the UNESCO General Conference. The groups are composed as follows; Group I is made up of Western European and North American States, Group II comprises of Eastern European States, Group III has the Latin-American and Caribbean States, Group IV comprises of Asian and Pacific States, Group V(a) gathers the African States and Group V(b) for the Arab States.
During this assembly’s session, twelve (12) vacant seats were open for election with two (2) seats for Group I, one (1) seat for Group II, two (2) seats for Group III, two (2) seats for Group IV, zero (0) seats for Group V(a), and zero (0) seats for Group V(b). In addition to those allocated seats, 5 remaining seats were also to be filled through a ballot open to any candidate of any electoral group. Unsuccessful candidates in the ballots for the allocated seats are automatically eligible to stand for election in the ballot for the 5 remaining seats, unless they declare otherwise.
However critical to note, is that there were no vacant seats for group V(a) where Uganda belongs. Uganda therefore was competing for the 5 open seats for any candidate world over, which is more difficult than the electoral group seats.
Uganda went ahead to succeed in the elections in which the following were candidates for the electoral groups; Australia, Bahrain, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Brazil, China, Guatemala, Hungary, Kyrgyzstan, Norway, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Spain.
The Uganda delegation to the meeting, which included The Ambassador of Uganda to France Dr. Richard Nduuhura and officials of the Uganda Embassy in Paris, was led by Hon. John Chrysostom Miyingo Minister of State for Higher Education.
Comments
![](https://sunrise.ug/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/logo-nav.png)